thage:Passing judgment on something (or someone) you know little or nothing about is irresponsible. What we know from the Walsh books and hearsay is just the tip of the iceberg. 99% of the truth we will never know. I consider Marty a friend and support him 100%. Do I think he was doping? I don't care. And if he did, I don't blame him. If fact, since he was racing in Europe in the late 90's, I'd expect him to. For that matter, I don't blame anyone who was doing just what everyone else was doing. If I had to make a decision between staying clean and losing a job or doping like everyone else and keeping food on the table for my family, I'd say "where's the needle, doc?"
So please don't make judgments on people or events we have little knowledge of. I'm sure Marty could take back the punch if he could. Then again, maybe not, because we have no idea what truly happened between these two guys. I just wish it didn't happen during the Tour of Utah and Marty used a bit more restraint (or waited for him at the end of the TT.)
There was certainly nothing judgmental in my statement. I based it on the article which said that Jemison punched Steffen. His described behavior just made him look like a bully to me. We're a nation of laws. If someone slanders you, you sue them. If someone punches you, you press charges. If they retract or are otherwise sorry, you come to a civil agreement and settle it. I don't know either man personally, but I do know that one of them is a liar, and at least one has a temper that could land him in trouble. Those are facts that I'm aware of.
Since you opened the can of worms, I must further say that I'm disappointed in your apparent justification of doping (in the 90's or otherwise). I don't feel sorry for any cyclist who was under pressure to perform. Most people are under pressure at their place of employment. Cyclists of character didn't bow under that pressure. For that reason I hold those who didn't dope and had to find other jobs to keep food on the table in highest regard. Similarly, cheating on a math test isn't justified just because you're not as smart as the others, and you want to be an astronaut really, really bad, and everybody's doing it anyway, and it just isn't fair, and waaah... At least I hope that's what everybody's teaching their kids. The reality is that for some the dream of winning the Tour is shattered only a few weeks into training, for others it's not until they roll into Paris. Distance from "the dream" notwithstanding, both are equally unjustified in cheating. No argument justifies cheating.
polskakielbasa.blogspot.com